193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11519348)
1. Resolving type Is in a written progress report.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 11519348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What is a type I and how do you clear one?
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11246635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New accreditation participation requirement regarding organizations' adherence to quality report approved for all programs.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Mar; 25(3):4. PubMed ID: 16578958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New APR requiring timely, periodic interactions between accredited organizations and the Joint Commission.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jun; 25(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 16145752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint Commission begins web-based BBI and PFI.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Oct; 25(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 16519340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Top type 1s for all of 2001. Common problem areas identified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 May; 22(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 12016718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. APPROVED: Revisions to the review and appeal procedures.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Jan; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23390727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Top compliance issues for all of 2003.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 May; 24(5):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 15168568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. GAO report affirms integrity of Joint Commission accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Feb; 27(2):3. PubMed ID: 17370750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplifying compliance activities.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11270206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating survey results.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 15085693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Standards, policy, and survey eligibility changes for 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(6):7. PubMed ID: 11142238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accreditation nomenclature revised, survey report clarified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(3-4):6. PubMed ID: 10313768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
