These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11519581)

  • 21. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory spectral integration in the perception of static vowels.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E; Chang CY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1667-81. PubMed ID: 21862680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
    Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acoustic invariance and the perception of place of articulation: a selective adaptation study.
    Landahl KL; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 7085995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of formant transitions in naturally produced stop consonant-vowel syllables.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Aug; 72(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 7119280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory spectral integration in nontraditional speech cues in diotic and dichotic listening.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):543-58. PubMed ID: 21162455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectral timbre perception in ferrets: discrimination of artificial vowels under different listening conditions.
    Bizley JK; Walker KM; King AJ; Schnupp JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):365-76. PubMed ID: 23297909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revisiting stop-consonant perception for two-formant stimuli.
    Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1551-5. PubMed ID: 3198876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The F1-F2 vowel chart for Czech whispered vowels a, e, i, o, u.
    Grepl M; Furst T; Pesak J
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):353-6. PubMed ID: 18345278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Formant frequencies in Estonian folk singing.
    Ross J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3532-9. PubMed ID: 1619129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.
    Stilp CE; Anderson PW; Assgari AA; Ellis GM; Zahorik P
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():168-178. PubMed ID: 27596251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Catalan speakers' perception of word stress in unaccented contexts.
    Ortega-Llebaria M; del Mar Vanrell M; Prieto P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):462-71. PubMed ID: 20058991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels.
    Assmann PF; Katz WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):886-95. PubMed ID: 15759708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of speaking rate on the perception of vowels.
    Gottfried TL; Miller JL; Payton PE
    Phonetica; 1990; 47(3-4):155-72. PubMed ID: 2151828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attention modulates the use of spectral attributes in vowel discrimination: behavioral and event-related potential evidence.
    Tuomainen J; Savela J; Obleser J; Aaltonen O
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():170-83. PubMed ID: 23174416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.