306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11519709)
1. Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants: Part 2--Clinical findings at 6 months postloading.
Holt R; Vernino AR; Lee HM; Severson S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Aug; 21(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 11519709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of early exposure on the integration of dental implants in the baboon: Part 1--Clinical findings at uncovering.
Severson S; Vernino AR; Caudill R; Holt R; Church C; Davis A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Apr; 20(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 11203558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of unintentional exposure of 2-stage implants upon subsequent osseointegration: histologic findings 6 months postloading.
Caudill R; Vernino AR; Holt R; Severson S; Church C
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 11203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery.
Tal H; Artzi Z; Moses O; Nemcovsky CE; Kozlovsky A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 11515998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of early loading on bony crest height and stability: a pilot study.
Brochu JF; Anderson JD; Zarb GA
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 16335170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft tissue exposure of endosseous implants between stage I and stage II surgery as a potential indicator of early crestal bone loss.
Toljanic JA; Banakis ML; Willes LA; Graham L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 10379119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histomorphometric comparison of implant anchorage for two types of dental implants after 3 and 6 months' healing in baboon jaws.
Carr AB; Larsen PE; Gerard DA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11264935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.
Shin YK; Han CH; Heo SJ; Kim S; Chun HJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 17066642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.
Vernino AR; Kohles SS; Holt RA; Lee HM; Caudill RF; Kenealy JN
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12212687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing.
Reddy MS; O'Neal SJ; Haigh S; Aponte-Wesson R; Geurs NC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 18548925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first year after loading.
Liaje A; Ozkan YK; Ozkan Y; Vanlioğlu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 22299093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants.
Yoo RH; Chuang SK; Erakat MS; Weed M; Dodson TB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16634496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
