193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11520149)
21. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Colposcopy Requirement of Papanicolaou Smear after Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) by Follow-up Protocol in an Urban Gynaecology Clinic, a Retrospective Study in Thailand.
Perksanusak T; Sananpanichkul P; Chirdchim W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4977-80. PubMed ID: 26163625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Papanicolaou and thin-layer cervical cytology with colposcopic biopsy control. A comparison.
Harkness CB; Theofrastous JP; Ibrahim SN; Galvin SL; Lawrence HC
J Reprod Med; 2003 Sep; 48(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 14562631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.
Fait G; Kupferminc MJ; Daniel Y; Geva E; Ron IG; Lessing JB; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11063640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. "See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.
Aue-Aungkul A; Punyawatanasin S; Natprathan A; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1723-6. PubMed ID: 22126552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Underlying pathology of women with "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" smears, in a region with a high incidence of cervical cancer.
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Tantipalakorn C; Suprasert P; Khunamornpong S; Nimmanhaeminda K; Siriaunkgul S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Apr; 34(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18412783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Colposcopy, cytology and histology in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Carta G; Di Stefano L; Catellani Perelli A; Toro G; Moscarini M
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1999; 26(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 10459438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?
Jeronimo J; Khan MJ; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15822121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among young women with abnormal screening cytology.
Massad SL; Markwell S; Cejtin HE; Collins Y
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Oct; 9(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 16205193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the atypical cytologic smear. Validity of the 1991 Bethesda System.
Widra EA; Dookhan D; Jordan A; McCue P; Bibbo M; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1994 Sep; 39(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 7807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Atypical squamous cells and low squamous intraepithelial lesions in postmenopausal women: implications for management.
Piccoli R; Mandato VD; Lavitola G; Acunzo G; Bifulco G; Tommaselli GA; Attianese W; Nappi C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Oct; 140(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 18603346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
