491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11520634)
1. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Platinum dissolution and tissue response following long-term electrical stimulation at high charge densities.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Dalrymple AN; Enke YL; Wise AK; Nguyen T; Firth J; Thompson A; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33578409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using non-charge-balanced stimuli.
Shepherd RK; Linahan N; Xu J; Clark GM; Araki S
Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 10587001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?
Coco A; Epp SB; Fallon JB; Xu J; Millard RE; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 17258411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Black RC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK; Seligman PM; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 9508028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis.
Shepherd RK; Webb RL; Clark GM; Pyman BC; Hirshorn MS; Murray MT; Houghton ME
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():71-81. PubMed ID: 6441446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.
Newbold C; Mergen S; Richardson R; Seligman P; Millard R; Cowan R; Shepherd R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 23998484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results.
Walsh SM; Leake-Jones PA
Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 7118732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats.
Leake PA; Hradek GT; Rebscher SJ; Snyder RL
Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 54(2):251-71. PubMed ID: 1938628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
