131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11521260)
1. Medical practice: HCFA's proposed final rule for Stark II provisions.
Pang B
J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 11521260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicare program; physicians' referrals; issuance of advisory opinions--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 1998 Jan; 63(6):1646-58. PubMed ID: 10177061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist; 2001 Jan; 66(3):856-965. PubMed ID: 11503745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Congressional anti-kickback battle hinges on HCFA's regulatory stance.
Levin-Epstein M
Manag Care; 2000 Apr; 9(4):10, 12. PubMed ID: 11182941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Stark truth. Government tries to make sense of long and complex law.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Jun; 100(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 15267024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations.
Davis JP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare and Medicaid programs; physicians' referrals to health care entities with which they have financial relationships--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1998 Jan; 63(6):1659-728. PubMed ID: 10177062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships.
Avery PA; Wachler AB
Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stark II and physician compensation models: integrating business and legal issues.
Pursell D; Marsh J; Thompson D; Potter K
J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 15968939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Not knowing the Stark lab rules can cost you big.
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 1996 Jan; 73(1):91-2, 94, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10153938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health-Care Financing Administration's proposed regulations to implement Stark II.
Bailes JS
Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Nov; 12(11A):364-5. PubMed ID: 10028519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility.
Chase L
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HCFA's proposed rule for Medicare payments in 2000.
Harris JA
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1999 Oct; 84(10):8-13. PubMed ID: 10622819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Stark II regulations: an analysis.
Chase L
West J Med; 2001 Oct; 175(4):263-5; discussion 266. PubMed ID: 11577058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New Stark regulations: Key issues for health care decision-makers.
Johnson BA; Niederman GA; Bowman LE; McCullough AC
Med Group Manage J; 1998; 45(2):10, 12-5, 50. PubMed ID: 10178589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare program; ambulance services--HCFA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1997 Jun; 62(116):32715-32. PubMed ID: 10169829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules.
Portman RM; Lisa GC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
