These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11521265)
21. Court grants HCQIA immunity in antitrust suit by physician. Smith v. Ricks. Hershey N Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Jun; 10(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 10183876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Hospital and doctors granted antitrust immunity in important peer review lawsuit. Austin v. McNamara. Kadzielski MA Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Feb; 8(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Austin v. McNamara: immunity from suit under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 10107512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Antitrust Act applies to hospitals. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1991 Aug; 47(2):21. PubMed ID: 10112947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Summary judgment against physician in antitrust litigation reversed. Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc. Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Sep; 17(11):6-8. PubMed ID: 11186480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Antitrust immunity granted in a far-reaching peer review case. Austin v. McNamara. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):19, 29. PubMed ID: 10183820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical staff closure antitrust considerations. Gordon L Health Care Law Mon; 2011 Dec; 2011(12):2-6. PubMed ID: 22256451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Upcoming Supreme Court decisions crucial for hospitals. Weissburg C; Arnold LR Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(1):43-4, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10110616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The physician cartel--potential hospital federal antitrust liability in class-based denial of staff privileges to clinical psychologists. Rypma JA Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1991 Jul; (149):7-33. PubMed ID: 10112686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Supreme Court expands view of interstate commerce in peer review proceeding. Neugebauer JE Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 10183511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What physicians should know about the antitrust laws. Miles JJ Allergy Proc; 1993; 14(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 8157165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law. Rakestraw E J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):563-78. PubMed ID: 19953408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Curtailing medical staff privileges: a case study. Kaminski K QRC Advis; 1997 Mar; 13(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 10164985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Limiting act's protection of physicians defeats aim of patient protection. Gittleman EP J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 8130838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Antitrust issues for the nurse anesthetist: areas of concern. Recht PR; Garg RK Nurse Anesth; 1992 Jun; 3(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 1606205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]