These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11521609)

  • 1. Validity in qualitative research.
    Whittemore R; Chase SK; Mandle CL
    Qual Health Res; 2001 Jul; 11(4):522-37. PubMed ID: 11521609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myth 94: qualitative health researchers will agree about validity.
    Sparkes AC
    Qual Health Res; 2001 Jul; 11(4):538-52. PubMed ID: 11521610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reconsidering evaluation criteria regarding health care research: toward an integrative framework of quantitative and qualitative criteria].
    Miyata H; Kai I
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2006 May; 53(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 16813064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
    Patton MQ
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PubMed ID: 10591279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.
    Devers KJ
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1153-88. PubMed ID: 10591278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity in qualitative health education research.
    FitzPatrick B
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Feb; 11(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 30733020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are validity and reliability "relevant" in qualitative evaluation research?
    Goodwin LD; Goodwin WL
    Eval Health Prof; 1984 Dec; 7(4):413-26. PubMed ID: 10269328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research.
    Hope KW; Waterman HA
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Oct; 44(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 14521679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Strategies, Reconceptualization, and Recommendations.
    Cypress BS
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2017; 36(4):253-263. PubMed ID: 28570380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative Research in Transplantation: Ensuring Relevance and Rigor.
    Tong A; Dew MA
    Transplantation; 2016 Apr; 100(4):710-2. PubMed ID: 26910328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From meaning to meaning: the influence of translation techniques on non-English focus group research.
    Esposito N
    Qual Health Res; 2001 Jul; 11(4):568-79. PubMed ID: 11521612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reconstituting evaluation methods based on both qualitative and quantitative paradigms].
    Miyata H; Okubo S; Yoshie S; Kai I
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2011 Jan; 66(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 21358139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.
    Cohen DJ; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2008; 6(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 18626033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [ Qualitative methods in empirical health research. II. Validity requirements].
    Maunsbach M; Dehlholm-Lambertsen B
    Nord Med; 1997 Feb; 112(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 9082334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.
    Boulton M; Fitzpatrick R; Swinburn C
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1996 Aug; 2(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 9238586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation.
    Babakus E; Mangold WG
    Health Serv Res; 1992 Feb; 26(6):767-86. PubMed ID: 1737708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Embracing ambiguities and valuing ourselves: issues of validity in action research.
    Waterman H
    J Adv Nurs; 1998 Jul; 28(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 9687136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: establishing standards for the utility of administrative claims data.
    Retchin SM; Ballard DJ
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Feb; 32(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 9460490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study.
    McBrien B
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1286-9. PubMed ID: 19043334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing efficacy of complementary medicine: adding qualitative research methods to the "Gold Standard".
    Verhoef MJ; Casebeer AL; Hilsden RJ
    J Altern Complement Med; 2002 Jun; 8(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12165185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.