These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11521609)

  • 21. Assessing efficacy of complementary medicine: adding qualitative research methods to the "Gold Standard".
    Verhoef MJ; Casebeer AL; Hilsden RJ
    J Altern Complement Med; 2002 Jun; 8(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12165185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Different light. Two studies question validity of volume measures.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Jan; 34(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 14959527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection criteria and external validity.
    Kozma CM
    Manag Care Interface; 2001 Jan; 14(1):53, 56. PubMed ID: 11214534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In defense of qualitative research: responses to the Poses and Isen perspectives article.
    Charon R; Greene MG; Adelman RD
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Jan; 13(1):67-8; author reply 69-72. PubMed ID: 9462504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What we want: qualitative research. Promising frontier for family medicine.
    Reid AJ
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 42():387-9, 397-400. PubMed ID: 8616275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Issues arising from the use of qualitative methods in health economics.
    Coast J; McDonald R; Baker R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2004 Jul; 9(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 15272976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].
    Stamer M; Güthlin C; Holmberg C; Karbach U; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Dec; 77(12):966-75. PubMed ID: 26714312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reading qualitative research from a methodological point of view.
    Cuevas NM; Dinero TE; Feit MD
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 10162906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of qualitative research in the "real world".
    Pyett PM
    Qual Health Res; 2003 Oct; 13(8):1170-9. PubMed ID: 14556426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1212-22. PubMed ID: 26184336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Qualitative approaches in health research.
    Plumridge EW
    N Z Med J; 2000 Nov; 113(1121):454-5. PubMed ID: 11194750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mixed Methods Research: The "Thing-ness" Problem.
    Hesse-Biber S
    Qual Health Res; 2015 Jun; 25(6):775-88. PubMed ID: 25888694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research.
    Forman J; Creswell JW; Damschroder L; Kowalski CP; Krein SL
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 18834752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs.
    Koepsell TD; Wagner EH; Cheadle AC; Patrick DL; Martin DC; Diehr PH; Perrin EB; Kristal AR; Allan-Andrilla CH; Dey LJ
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1992; 13():31-57. PubMed ID: 1599591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
    Xie YM; Liao X
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are qualitative methods misunderstood?
    Ezzy D
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2001 Aug; 25(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 11529607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Valid arguments? a consideration of the concept of validity in establishing the credibility of research findings.
    Avis M
    J Adv Nurs; 1995 Dec; 22(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 8675876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer.
    Morris SM
    Qual Health Res; 2001 Jul; 11(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 11521611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Incident reporting: science or protoscience? Ten years later.
    Kaplan H; Barach P
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Jun; 11(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 12448806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.