These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11521854)

  • 1. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1231-42. PubMed ID: 14710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 10909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prioritization by transients in visual search.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 15948285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: evidence against visual marking.
    Donk M; Verburg RC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 15260194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual marking: a convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search.
    Atchley P; Jones SE; Hoffman L
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 12956576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):946-62. PubMed ID: 9627427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?
    Gellatly A; Cole G; Blurton A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1609-24. PubMed ID: 10641313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Aug; 47(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 12852934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default?
    Zupan Z; Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1442-61. PubMed ID: 26168141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.
    Yantis S; Jonides J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 2137514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.