BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11522115)

  • 1. Evaluation of Aution Max AX-4280 automated urine test-strip analyser.
    Zaman Z; Roggeman S; Cappelletti P; Ferrai G; Buxeda M; Barba N
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Jul; 39(7):649-57. PubMed ID: 11522115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European multicentre evaluation of the Super Aution SA-4220 urinalysis analyser.
    Galimany R; Arambarri M; Biosca C; Ceriotti F; Chapelle JP; Lopez R; Souverijn JH; Spagnuolo G; Scopacasa F; Almirall L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):947-58. PubMed ID: 9915228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Aution Max AX-4030 and 9UB Uriflet, 10PA Aution Sticks urine dipsticks in the automated urine test strip analysis.
    Rota C; Biondi M; Trenti T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Sep; 50(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 21942852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of glucose, proteins, blood and leucocytes in urines: evaluation of automated analyzer Aution Max AX 4280].
    Steinmetz J; Henny J; Gueguen R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 16330380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urinalysis.
    Wilson LA
    Nurs Stand; 2005 May 11-17; 19(35):51-4. PubMed ID: 15915958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urinalysis with the new fully automated analyzer Supertron.
    Nagel DW; Seiler DJ
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Mar; 33(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 7605827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an automated urine chemistry reagent-strip analyzer.
    Lott JA; Johnson WR; Luke KE
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1995; 9(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 7602430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three automated urinalysis systems--Bayer Clinitek Atlas, Roche Urisys 2400 and Arkray Aution Max for testing urine chemistry and detection of bacteriuria.
    Chien TI; Lu JY; Kao JT; Lee TF; Ho SY; Chang CY; Liu CW; Lee CH; Yan SN; Yang JY; Lin PC; Wang MJ
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 377(1-2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17049339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the appropriate time period between sampling and analyzing for automated urinalysis.
    Dolscheid-Pommerich RC; Klarmann-Schulz U; Conrad R; Stoffel-Wagner B; Zur B
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 26981022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicentre evaluation of the urine analyser Miditron Junior.
    Gambke B; Kouri T; Kutter D; Nagel D; Vukovich T; Wefers A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1997 Nov; 57(7):605-11. PubMed ID: 9397492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation study: clarity multistrip urocheck.
    Hartgrove K; Intrevado P; Abel SR
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 18678137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the CLINITEK ATLAS for routine macroscopic urinalysis.
    Dias VC; Moschopedis T; Prosser C; Yatscoff RW
    Clin Biochem; 1996 Jun; 29(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 8740507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of contaminant interferences which cause positive urine reagent test strip reactions in a cage setting for the laboratory-housed nonhuman primate, Beagle dog, and Sprague-Dawley rat.
    Siska WD; Meyer DJ; Schultze AE; Brandoff C
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 28295488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-centre evaluation of the urine test strip analyser Rapimat.
    Haeckel R; Bonini P; Ceriotti G; Kutter D; Vonderschmitt DJ
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1985 Aug; 23(8):473-92. PubMed ID: 4056663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of urine relative density using refractometer and reagent strips.
    Dorizzi RM; Caputo M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):925-8. PubMed ID: 9915224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Four Automated Urinalysis Systems Compared to Reference Methods.
    Bartosova K; Kubicek Z; Franekova J; Louzensky G; Lavrikova P; Jabor A
    Clin Lab; 2016 Nov; 62(11):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 28164659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the ARKRAY AUTION Eleven reflectometer in detecting microalbuminuria with AUTION Screen test strips and proteinuria with AUTION Sticks 10PA strips.
    Kouri T; Nokelainen P; Pelkonen V; Kosaka H; Saeger B
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2009; 69(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 18923968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Examination of urine in the office].
    Hofstetter A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Jul; 147(29-30):45-7. PubMed ID: 16116849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?
    Imran S; Eva G; Christopher S; Flynn E; Henner D
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(6):426-30. PubMed ID: 21089176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ames Clinitek 200/Multistix 9 urinalysis method compared with manual and microscopic methods.
    Grinstead GF; Scott RE; Stevens BS; Ward VL; Wilson DM
    Clin Chem; 1987 Sep; 33(9):1660-2. PubMed ID: 3621568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.