These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11522197)
1. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Thomas JA; Bourn NA; Clarke RT; Stewart KE; Simcox DJ; Pearman GS; Curtis R; Goodger B Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 268(1478):1791-6. PubMed ID: 11522197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thyme and isolation for the Sinai baton blue butterfly (Pseudophilotes sinaicus). James M; Gilbert F; Zalat S Oecologia; 2003 Feb; 134(3):445-53. PubMed ID: 12647154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features. Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland? Kalarus K; Nowicki P PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138557. PubMed ID: 26375036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed population explosion of an introduced butterfly. Boggs CL; Holdren CE; Kulahci IG; Bonebrake TC; Inouye BD; Fay JP; McMillan A; Williams EH; Ehrlich PR J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):466-75. PubMed ID: 16637999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population. Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches. Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance on howler monkeys: a review. Arroyo-Rodríguez V; Dias PA Am J Primatol; 2010 Jan; 72(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19852004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-segregation in heterogeneous metapopulation landscapes. de Kemmeter JF; Carletti T; Asllani M J Theor Biol; 2022 Dec; 554():111271. PubMed ID: 36075456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Hanski I; Ovaskainen O Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):755-8. PubMed ID: 10783887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. Ovaskainen O; Hanski I Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):364-77. PubMed ID: 15478091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metapopulation dynamics in the butterfly Hipparchia semele changed decades before occupancy declined in The Netherlands. Van Strien AJ; Van Swaay CA; Kéry M Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2510-20. PubMed ID: 22073640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Species persistence in landscapes with spatial variation in habitat quality: a pair approximation model. Liao J; Li Z; Hiebeler DE; Iwasa Y; Bogaert J; Nijs I J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 335():22-30. PubMed ID: 23792314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Habitat selection and metapopulation structure: a multi-year study of distribution of the Hodgson's pipit, Anthus Hodgsoni Richm. (Aves, Passeriformes)]. Burskiĭ OV Zh Obshch Biol; 2008; 69(5):323-43. PubMed ID: 18956571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands. Pöyry J; Paukkunen J; Heliölä J; Kuussaari M Oecologia; 2009 Jun; 160(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 19330356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes. Hovestadt T; Binzenhöfer B; Nowicki P; Settele J J Anim Ecol; 2011 Sep; 80(5):1070-7. PubMed ID: 21585369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. Hanski I; Saastamoinen M; Ovaskainen O J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 16903046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics. Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries. Schultz CB; Franco AM; Crone EE J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):724-34. PubMed ID: 22272654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative importance of host plant patch geometry and habitat quality on the patterns of occupancy, extinction and density of the monophagous butterfly Iolana iolas. Rabasa SG; Gutiérrez D; Escudero A Oecologia; 2008 Jun; 156(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 18327616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]