These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11525721)

  • 1. Completeness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, Canada.
    Wang FL; Gabos S; Sibbald B; Lowry RB
    Chronic Dis Can; 2001; 22(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11525721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry.
    Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
    Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
    Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
    Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.
    Lowry RB; Thunem NY; Anderson-Redick S
    CMAJ; 1989 Dec; 141(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 2819634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
    Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
    Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ICD-10 coding for congenital anomalies: a Canadian experience.
    Bedard T; Lowry RB; Sibbald B
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 23270084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Congenital anomalies ascertained by two record systems run in parallel in the Canadian Province of Alberta.
    Wen SW; Rouleau J; Lowry RB; Kinakin B; Anderson-Redick S; Sibbald B; Turner T
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 10927847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Congenital heart defect case ascertainment by the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.
    Bedard T; Lowry RB; Sibbald B; Harder JR; Trevenen C; Horobec V; Dyck JD
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Jun; 94(6):449-58. PubMed ID: 22473636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
    Miller E
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects.
    Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Determination of one national standard for children with congenital anomalies in the National Obstetrical Registry and in the National Neonatal Registry].
    Dorrepaal CA; den Ouden AL; Cornel MC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Mar; 142(12):645-9. PubMed ID: 9623130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
    Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organizing population data into complex family pedigrees: application of a second-order data linkage to state birth defects registries.
    Tu S; Mason CA
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 15368560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the validity of a computer system for probabilistic record linkage of birth and infant death records in Canada. The Fetal and Infant Health Study Group.
    Fair M; Cyr M; Allen AC; Wen SW; Guyon G; MacDonald RC
    Chronic Dis Can; 2000; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10813688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of defects identified through Minnesota's Birth Defects Information System And Vital Records, 2006-2008.
    Banerjee E; Zabel E; Alexander B
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23270085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paper 3: EUROCAT data quality indicators for population-based registries of congenital anomalies.
    Loane M; Dolk H; Garne E; Greenlees R;
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Mar; 91 Suppl 1():S23-30. PubMed ID: 21384530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida.
    Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new registry of congenital anomalies in Iran.
    Dastgiri S; Kalankesh LR; Heidarzadehe M; Tajahmad A; Rezaian E
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 20795567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.