These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11526612)

  • 21. Effectiveness of a reference accuracy strategy for peer-reviewed journal articles.
    Speck KE; St Pierre Schneider B
    Nurse Educ; 2013; 38(6):265-8. PubMed ID: 24157676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predatory Journals: What Nurse Educators Need to Know.
    Fitzpatrick JJ
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(1):7. PubMed ID: 29194149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Copyright violation of predators in scientific publishing - Biochemia Medica's harmful experience and proposed solution.
    Pašalić D; Šupak Smolčić V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020201. PubMed ID: 32550811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Manual Therapy Cures Death: I Think I Read That Somewhere.
    Cook CE; Cleland JA; Mintken PE
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Nov; 48(11):830-832. PubMed ID: 30381025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
    Glover D
    J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research.
    Bhattacharya R; Ellis LM
    Bioessays; 2018 Jan; 40(1):. PubMed ID: 29226979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship.
    Dumenco L; Engle DL; Goodell K; Nagler A; Ovitsh RK; Whicker SA
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 27680319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top producers of scholarly publications in clinical psychology PhD programs.
    Stewart PK; Wu YP; Roberts MC
    J Clin Psychol; 2007 Dec; 63(12):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17972296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Predatory journals: how their publishers operate and how to avoid them].
    Kratochvíl J; Plch L
    Vnitr Lek; 2017; 63(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28225287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
    Moore A
    Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
    Pendlebury DA
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
    Ferris LE; Winker MA
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28694719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus.
    Colaianni LA
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 8015132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(10):1647-55. PubMed ID: 7743450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.