155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11527039)
1. Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.
Walden BE; Grant KW; Cord MT
Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 11527039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
Hedrick MS; Rice T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters.
Breeuwer M; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):481-99. PubMed ID: 3950202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
Souza PE; Bishop RD
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech.
Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1065-73. PubMed ID: 8132900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.
Mason M; Kokkinakis K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24686826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes.
van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech-cue transmission by an algorithm to increase consonant recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Apoux F; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3325. PubMed ID: 25480077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
Souza PE; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
