These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11527056)

  • 1. Discordant normal ranges for proximal femur bone density in Australia.
    Pocock N; Culton N; Noakes K; Harmelin D
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):576-80. PubMed ID: 11527056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence.
    Binkley N; Kiebzak GM; Lewiecki EM; Krueger D; Gangnon RE; Miller PD; Shepherd JA; Drezner MK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Feb; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 15647812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population bone mineral density measurements for Chinese women and men in Hong Kong.
    Woo J; Li M; Lau E
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11420778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardized with the European Spine Phantom.
    Pearson J; Dequeker J; Reeve J; Felsenberg D; Henley M; Bright J; Lunt M; Adams J; Diaz Curiel M; Galan F
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Feb; 10(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 7754813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for GE Lunar systems.
    Fan B; Shepherd JA; Levine MA; Steinberg D; Wacker W; Barden HS; Ergun D; Wu XP
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(3):344-77. PubMed ID: 24161789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle.
    Lu Y; Fuerst T; Hui S; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 11446558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.
    Ganda K; Nguyen TV; Pocock N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():180. PubMed ID: 25527404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference ranges for bone densitometers adopted Australia-wide: Geelong osteoporosis study.
    Henry MJ; Pasco JA; Pocock NA; Nicholson GC; Kotowicz MA
    Australas Radiol; 2004 Dec; 48(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 15601326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry normal reference range use within the UK and the effect of different normal ranges on the assessment of bone density.
    Simmons A; Barrington S; O'Doherty MJ; Coakley AJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):903-9. PubMed ID: 7551789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years.
    Ward KA; Ashby RL; Roberts SA; Adams JE; Zulf Mughal M
    Arch Dis Child; 2007 Jan; 92(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16943261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
    Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
    Faulkner KG; Roberts LA; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(6):432-6. PubMed ID: 9116387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total lymphocyte count and femoral bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
    Di Monaco M; Vallero F; Di Monaco R; Mautino F; Cavanna A
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2004; 22(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 14691689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
    Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone mineral density reference range in Estonia: a comparison with the standard database (NHANES III).
    Kull M; Kallikorm R; Lember M
    J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 19880053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly.
    Kiel DP; Mercier CA; Dawson-Hughes B; Cali C; Hannan MT; Anderson JJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1130-6. PubMed ID: 7484290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient assessment using standardized bone mineral density values and a national reference database: implementing uniform thresholds for the reimbursement of osteoporosis treatments in Belgium.
    Boonen S; Kaufman JM; Reginster JY; Devogelaer JP
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 12730782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12817754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.