These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase. Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting thresholds in allergic contact dermatitis: safety and regulatory considerations. Basketter DA; Evans P; Gerberick GF; Kimber IA Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12225405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme. Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular profiling of contact dermatitis skin identifies allergen-dependent differences in immune response. Dhingra N; Shemer A; Correa da Rosa J; Rozenblit M; Fuentes-Duculan J; Gittler JK; Finney R; Czarnowicki T; Zheng X; Xu H; Estrada YD; Cardinale I; Suárez-Fariñas M; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):362-72. PubMed ID: 24768652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Categorization of chemicals according to their relative human skin sensitizing potency. Basketter DA; Alépée N; Ashikaga T; Barroso J; Gilmour N; Goebel C; Hibatallah J; Hoffmann S; Kern P; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Maxwell G; Reisinger K; Sakaguchi H; Schepky A; Tailhardat M; Templier M Dermatitis; 2014; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 24407057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: which factors are relevant? (review of the literature). de Waard-van der Spek FB; Andersen KE; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Jun; 24(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 23373713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the new standard for eugenol designed to protect against contact sensitization protect those sensitized from elicitation of the reaction? Svedman C; Engfeldt M; Api AM; Politano VT; Belsito DV; Gruvberger B; Bruze M Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 22653067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Johansen JD; Skov L; Volund A; Andersen K; Menné T Br J Dermatol; 1998 Aug; 139(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 9767240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch test results of hand eczema patients: relation to clinical types. Boonstra MB; Christoffers WA; Coenraads PJ; Schuttelaar ML J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 May; 29(5):940-7. PubMed ID: 25220568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathogenesis and causations of systemic contact dermatitis. Rundle CW; Machler BC; Jacob SE G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Feb; 154(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29998717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of elicitation potential of chloroatranol and atranol--2 allergens in oak moss absolute. Johansen JD; Bernard G; Giménez-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Bruze M; Andersen KE Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Apr; 54(4):192-5. PubMed ID: 16650093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can exposure limitations for well-known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose-response patch test data. Fischer LA; Menné T; Voelund A; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jun; 64(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 21535006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Nethercott JR; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS J Am Acad Dermatol; 1998 Jun; 38(6 Pt 1):911-8. PubMed ID: 9631997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymphocyte surface markers and cytokines are suitable for detection and potency assessment of skin-sensitizing chemicals in an in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis: the LCSA-ly. Frombach J; Sonnenburg A; Krapohl BD; Zuberbier T; Peiser M; Stahlmann R; Schreiner M Arch Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 92(4):1495-1505. PubMed ID: 29380012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Fontana E; Belloni Fortina A G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Dec; 149(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 25315290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience. Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]