112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11527592)
61. Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations.
Wei K; Skyba DM; Firschke C; Jayaweera AR; Lindner JR; Kaul S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 29(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 9120163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Sonographic depiction of woodchuck hepatomas using intravenously injected contrast agents].
Nada T; Moriyasu F; Kono Y; Matsumura T
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Apr; 56(4):980-4. PubMed ID: 9577620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Microcirculation volumetric flow assessment using high-resolution, contrast-assisted images.
Yeh CK; Lu SY; Chen YS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 18334315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Evaluation of dynamic changes in microvascular flow during ischemia-reperfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Galiuto L; DeMaria AN; May-Newman K; Del Balzo U; Ohmori K; Bhargava V; Flaim SF; Iliceto S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Oct; 32(4):1096-101. PubMed ID: 9768738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Contrast agent specific imaging modes for the ultrasonic assessment of parenchymal cerebral echo contrast enhancement.
Postert T; Hoppe P; Federlein J; Helbeck S; Ermert H; Przuntek H; Büttner T; Wilkening W
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2000 Dec; 20(12):1709-16. PubMed ID: 11129787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors.
Saracco A; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Themudo R; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):854-9. PubMed ID: 19634024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Transcranial contrast imaging of cerebral perfusion in stroke patients following decompressive craniectomy.
Bartels E; Bittermann HJ
Ultraschall Med; 2004 Jun; 25(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 15146361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Intraoperative brain ultrasound: a new approach to study flow dynamics in intracranial aneurysms.
Hölscher T; Rodriguez-Rodriguez J; Wilkening WG; Lasheras JC; U HS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1307-13. PubMed ID: 16965970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 22214685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Intravascular inertial cavitation activity detection and quantification in vivo with Optison.
Tu J; Hwang JH; Matula TJ; Brayman AA; Crum LA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1601-9. PubMed ID: 17045881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Bolus versus continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent for liver ultrasound by using an automatic power injector in humans: A pilot study.
Quaia E; Gennari AG; Angileri R; Cova MA
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016; 44(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 26302446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Effect of microbubble contrast on intracranial blood flow velocity assessed by transcranial Doppler.
Logallo N; Fromm A; Waje-Andreassen U; Thomassen L; Matre K
J Ultrasound; 2014 Mar; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 24616748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effects of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction on cardiac gene expression.
Bekeredjian R; Chen S; Pan W; Grayburn PA; Shohet RV
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 15121256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Modeling ultrasound contrast measurement of blood flow and perfusion in biological tissue.
Thijssen JM; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 15708468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Assessment of regional myocardial hypoperfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography using intravenous bolus application in patients with acute chest pain: a double case report.
Hagendorff A; Goeckritz A; Neugebauer A; Rother T; Linke T; Pfeiffer D; Becher H
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2003 Dec; 4(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 14611829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Myocardial regional blood flow: quantitative measurement by computer analysis of contrast enhanced echocardiographic images.
Mor-Avi V; David D; Akselrod S; Bitton Y; Choshniak I
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(8):619-33. PubMed ID: 8134967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Renal perfusion parameters measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in healthy dogs demonstrate a wide range of variability in the long-term.
Liu DJX; Hesta M; Stock E; Bogaerts E; Broeckx BJG; Saunders JH; Vanderperren K
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2019 Mar; 60(2):201-209. PubMed ID: 30276919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Assessment of myocardial perfusion with second harmonic imaging--using intravenous injection of Albunex and Levovist].
Hasegawa M; Saiki Y; Kayano H; Katagiri T
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Apr; 56(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 9577606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effects of contrast agent infusion rates on thresholds for tissue damage produced by single exposures of high-intensity ultrasound.
Tran BC; Seo J; Hall TL; Fowlkes JB; Cain CA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1121-30. PubMed ID: 16212251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in the quantification of brain perfusion parameters of a rat stroke model: Analysis of contrast agent bolus kinetic dynamics.
Cruz ASD; Drehmer MM; Baetas-da-Cruz W; Machado JC
J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Jan; 401():110005. PubMed ID: 37931754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
