These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11527593)
1. Automated embolus identification using a rule-based expert system. Fan L; Evans DH; Naylor AR Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 27(8):1065-77. PubMed ID: 11527593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of new online automated embolic signal detection algorithm, including comparison with panel of international experts. Cullinane M; Reid G; Dittrich R; Kaposzta Z; Ackerstaff R; Babikian V; Droste DW; Grossett D; Siebler M; Valton L; Markus HS Stroke; 2000 Jun; 31(6):1335-41. PubMed ID: 10835453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time identification and archiving of micro-embolic Doppler signals using a knowledge-based DSP system. Fan L; Evans DH; Naylor AR; Tortoli P Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 15125149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic embolus detection by a neural network. Kemény V; Droste DW; Hermes S; Nabavi DG; Schulte-Altedorneburg G; Siebler M; Ringelstein EB Stroke; 1999 Apr; 30(4):807-10. PubMed ID: 10187883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a 1-MHz and a 2-MHz probe for microembolus detection using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Droste DW; Lerner T; Dittrich R; Ritter M; Ringelstein EB Neurol Res; 2005 Jul; 27(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 15978172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RF signals provide additional information on embolic events recorded during TCD monitoring. Cowe J; Gittins J; Naylor AR; Evans DH Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):613-23. PubMed ID: 15866411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of clinical environment on embolus detection: a comparison of automated and manual detection of Doppler embolic signals. Chung EM; Fan L; Naylor AR; Evans DH Cerebrovasc Dis; 2007; 23(2-3):169-74. PubMed ID: 17124399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online automated detection of cerebral embolic signals using a wavelet-based system. Marvasti S; Gillies D; Marvasti F; Markus HS Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 15183231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved automated detection of embolic signals using a novel frequency filtering approach. Markus H; Cullinane M; Reid G Stroke; 1999 Aug; 30(8):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10436109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multigate transcranial Doppler ultrasound system with real-time embolic signal identification and archival. Fan L; Boni E; Tortoli P; Evans DH IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1853-61. PubMed ID: 17036793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Russell D; Brucher R Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):1975-80. PubMed ID: 12154248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The matching pursuit: a new method of characterizing microembolic signals? Devuyst G; Vesin JM; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 26(6):1051-6. PubMed ID: 10996705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Automated Electronic Microemboli Detection System in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy. Leunissen T; van Vriesland D; den Ruijter H; Moll F; Mess W; de Borst GJ Ultraschall Med; 2018 Apr; 39(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 28384835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of Doppler Microembolic Signals Using High Order Statistics. Geryes M; Ménigot S; Hassan W; Mcheick A; Charara J; Girault JM Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():3243290. PubMed ID: 28096889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic detection of emboli in the TCD RF signal using principal component analysis. Cowe J; Evans DH Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1853-67. PubMed ID: 17169698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online automated detection of cerebral embolic signals from a variety of embolic sources. Cullinane M; Kaposzta Z; Reihill S; Markus HS Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Oct; 28(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 12467853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic online embolus detection and artifact rejection with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Brucher R; Russell D Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):1969-74. PubMed ID: 12154247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microembolic signal description: a reappraisal based on a customized digital postprocessing system. Mess WH; Willigers JM; Ledoux LA; Ackerstaff RG; Hoeks AP Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002; 28(11-12):1447-55. PubMed ID: 12498940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD. Devuyst G; Darbellay GA; Vesin JM; Kemény V; Ritter M; Droste DW; Molina C; Serena J; Sztajzel R; Ruchat P; Lucchesi C; Dietler G; Ringelstein EB; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J Stroke; 2001 Dec; 32(12):2803-9. PubMed ID: 11739977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]