417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11528111)
1. Comparative genomic hybridization based strategy for the analysis of different chromosome imbalances detected in conventional cytogenetic diagnostics.
Tönnies H; Stumm M; Wegner RD; Chudoba I; Kalscheuer V; Neitzel H
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 2001; 93(3-4):188-94. PubMed ID: 11528111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias.
Verdorfer I; Brecevic L; Saul W; Schenker B; Kirsch M; Trautmann U; Helm G; Gramatzki M; Gebhart E
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Jan; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11165314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Jarosová M; Holzerová M; Jedlicková K; Mihál V; Zuna J; Starý J; Pospísilová D; Zemanová Z; Trka J; Blazek J; Pikalová Z; Indrák K
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2000 Dec; 123(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 11156736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Delineating a supernumerary marker chromosome by combining several cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques].
Tan YQ; Di YF; Song YZ; Cheng DH; Li LY; Lu GX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 17680527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytogenetic aberrations in myelodysplastic syndrome detected by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Wilkens L; Burkhardt D; Tchinda J; Büsche G; Werner M; Nolte M; Ganser A; Georgii A
Diagn Mol Pathol; 1999 Mar; 8(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 10408793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural unbalanced chromosome rearrangements resolved by comparative genomic hybridization.
Daniely M; Barkai G; Goldman B; Aviram-Goldring A
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 86(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10516433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of De Novo and Rare Inherited Copy Number Variants in Children with Syndromic Congenital Heart Defects.
Hussein IR; Bader RS; Chaudhary AG; Bassiouni R; Alquaiti M; Ashgan F; Schulten HJ; Al Qahtani MH
Pediatr Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):924-940. PubMed ID: 29541814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CGH-Profiler: data mining based on genomic aberration profiles.
Schubert F; Tausch B; Joos S; Eils R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():188. PubMed ID: 16042799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?
Bejjani BA; Saleki R; Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Theisen A; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG
Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Apr; 134(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15723295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.
Lomax B; Tang S; Separovic E; Phillips D; Hillard E; Thomson T; Kalousek DK
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1516-21. PubMed ID: 10741955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined study of prostatic carcinoma by classical cytogenetic analysis and comparative genomic hybridization.
Verdorfer I; Hobisch A; Culig Z; Hittmair A; Bartsch G; Erdel M; Duba HC; Utermann G
Int J Oncol; 2001 Dec; 19(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 11713598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics.
Bryndorf T; Kirchhoff M; Rose H; Maahr J; Gerdes T; Karhu R; Kallioniemi A; Christensen B; Lundsteen C; Philip J
Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 7485173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A de novo complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 9 and 11 detected prenatally and studied postnatally by conventional cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetic analyses.
Mechoso B; Vaglio A; Quadrelli A; Mark HF; Huang XL; Milunsky A; Quadrelli R
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 17369689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening of genomic imbalances in glioblastoma multiforme using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization.
Vranová V; Necesalová E; Kuglík P; Cejpek P; Pesáková M; Budínská E; Relichová J; Veselská R
Oncol Rep; 2007 Feb; 17(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 17203188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a CGH microarray for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis.
Cheung SW; Shaw CA; Yu W; Li J; Ou Z; Patel A; Yatsenko SA; Cooper ML; Furman P; Stankiewicz P; Lupski JR; Chinault AC; Beaudet AL
Genet Med; 2005; 7(6):422-32. PubMed ID: 16024975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of hematologic diseases using conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Wilkens L; Tchinda J; Burkhardt D; Nolte M; Werner M; Georgii A
Hum Pathol; 1998 Aug; 29(8):833-9. PubMed ID: 9712425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of microarray analysis into the clinical diagnosis of hematological malignancies: How much can we improve cytogenetic testing?
Peterson JF; Aggarwal N; Smith CA; Gollin SM; Surti U; Rajkovic A; Swerdlow SH; Yatsenko SA
Oncotarget; 2015 Aug; 6(22):18845-62. PubMed ID: 26299921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).
Schoumans J; Ruivenkamp C; Holmberg E; Kyllerman M; Anderlid BM; Nordenskjöld M
J Med Genet; 2005 Sep; 42(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 16141005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
