BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11528507)

  • 1. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removing phenotypic distribution assumptions from tests of linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 12652523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted variance FBAT: a powerful method for including covariates in FBAT analyses.
    Lu AT; Cantor RM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 17323371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multipoint analysis of quantitative traits.
    Marlow AJ; John S; Worthington J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9433588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting analyses of continuous covariates in affected sibling pair linkage studies.
    Schmidt S; Qin X; Schmidt MA; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):541-52. PubMed ID: 17410529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method revisited: a robust approach for model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in large sibships.
    Cobat A; Abel L; Alcaïs A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 21181896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multivariate model for the analysis of sibship covariance structure using marker information and multiple quantitative traits.
    Vogler GP; Tang W; Nelson TL; Hofer SM; Grant JD; Tarantino LM; Fernandez JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):921-6. PubMed ID: 9433601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MCMC-based linkage analysis for complex traits on general pedigrees: multipoint analysis with a two-locus model and a polygenic component.
    Sung YJ; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17123301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of multipoint identity-by-descent methods to detect linkage using variance component models.
    Ekstrøm CT
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11754465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of covariates: a summary of Group 5 contributions.
    Hauser ER; Hsu FC; Daley D; Olson JM; Rampersaud E; Lin JP; Paterson AD; Poisson LM; Chase GA; Dahmen G; Ziegler A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003; 25 Suppl 1():S43-9. PubMed ID: 14635168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust transmission regression models for linkage and association.
    Schaid DJ; Rowland CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S78-84. PubMed ID: 11055374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The method of sib-pair linkage analysis in context of case-control design.
    Yang Q; Atkinson M; Sun F; Sherman S; Khoury MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):939-44. PubMed ID: 9433604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.