These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Containing health care costs: ethical and legal implications of changes in the methods of paying physicians. Capron AM; Brock DW; Cassell EJ Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1985-1986; 36(4):708-77. PubMed ID: 11650769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct in investigational drug trials. Shapiro MF; Charrow RP N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(11):731-6. PubMed ID: 3974649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects. Bloom MJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. But the publicity is premature. Hedgepeth JH Hospitals; 1974 Jan; 48(2):34 passim. PubMed ID: 4809994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance--how did we come to this? Russell JC Conn Med; 1991 Aug; 55(8):464-7. PubMed ID: 1935068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Freedom and authority in the practice of medicine. Watson WC Can Med Assoc J; 1972 May; 106(9):983-4 passim. PubMed ID: 4623749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. County medical association's ethics investigation upheld. J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1972 Jan; 65(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 5007887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in gene therapy regulation. Lecomte V; Taylor A Gene Ther; 1997 Feb; 4(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 11644906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Letter: Peer review or federal peering? N Engl J Med; 1973 Nov; 289(19):1045-6. PubMed ID: 4795415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protect yourself against a sexual-misconduct charge. Crane M Med Econ; 1996 Sep; 73(17):90, 92, 98 passim. PubMed ID: 10161877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Control of malpractice by peer review. Norris FS J Med Educ; 1971 Jul; 46(7):634-5. PubMed ID: 5558310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The case of the switched embryos. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(6):13-9. PubMed ID: 8609009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Malpractice, medical discipline, and the public. Derbyshire RC Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1984 Jan; 19(1):209-10, 214-6, 220-1 passim. PubMed ID: 6420322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal liability of institutional ethics committees to patients. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of alternatives to medical/dental malpractice litigation. Ursu SC Dent Clin North Am; 1982 Apr; 26(2):423-38. PubMed ID: 7040130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]