104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11529118)
1. Worldwide progress on chemical assessment.
J Environ Monit; 1999 Jun; 1(3):42N. PubMed ID: 11529118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hormesis, non-linearity, and risk communication.
Calabrese E
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 28(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 19411553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advances in EDC testing.
J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):97N. PubMed ID: 11296775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Damned liars].
Markowitz G; Rosner D
Epidemiol Prev; 2003; 27(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 12693286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US introduces consolidated regs.
J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):93N-94N. PubMed ID: 11296765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science and regulation. New science for chemicals policy.
Schwarzman MR; Wilson MP
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5956):1065-6. PubMed ID: 19965413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Databases applicable to quantitative hazard/risk assessment--towards a predictive systems toxicology.
Waters M; Jackson M
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 18675838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemical process safety needs effort from industry, government and public.
Beddows N
Occup Health Saf; 1991 Jun; 60(6):66-7. PubMed ID: 1866116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental data assessment for use in public health surveillance.
Niskar AS
J Environ Health; 2007 Nov; 70(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 18044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EPA focuses on off-site consequences but overlap exists with process safety.
Dennison M
Occup Health Saf; 1994 Dec; 63(12):20-5. PubMed ID: 15655982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Putting chemicals on a path to better risk assessment.
Stokstad E
Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5941):694-5. PubMed ID: 19661414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NRC: not enough data.
Greene LA
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Jan; 108(1):A16. PubMed ID: 10691362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toxicological resources for cumulative risk: an example with hazardous air pollutants.
Fox MA; Tran NL; Groopman JD; Burke TA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 40(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 15546684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulatory science. Changes to EPA toxicology--speed or delay?
Stokstad E
Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5874):304-5. PubMed ID: 18420908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Collection and evaluation of existing data: an ecological risk assessment perspective.
Markwiese JT
Qual Assur; 2003; 10(3-4):107-16. PubMed ID: 15764549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. America pushes to overhaul chemical safety law.
Borrell B
Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):599. PubMed ID: 20130623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Confounders in interpreting pathology for safety and risk assessment.
Wolf DC; Mann PC
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Feb; 202(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 15667835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human health risk assessment database, "the NHSRC toxicity value database": supporting the risk assessment process at US EPA's National Homeland Security Research Center.
Moudgal CJ; Garrahan K; Brady-Roberts E; Gavrelis N; Arbogast M; Dun S
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 18692516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science, policy, and trends of metals risk assessment at EPA: how understanding metals bioavailability has changed metals risk assessment at US EPA.
Reiley MC
Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 17662477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dichlorvos: a regulatory conundrum.
Mennear JH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Jun; 27(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 9693077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
