253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11531229)
1. A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability.
Kozhevnikov M; Hegarty M
Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):745-56. PubMed ID: 11531229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the relationship between children's perspective taking in complex scenes and their spatial drawing ability.
Ebersbach M; Stiehler S; Asmus P
Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 29(Pt 3):455-74. PubMed ID: 21848741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of certain task characteristics on performance of two neuropsychological tests of spatial ability.
Alfano PL; Michel GF
Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):379-90. PubMed ID: 8022665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitated pointing to remembered objects in front: evidence for egocentric retrieval or for spatial priming?
Kelly JW; McNamara TP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 19293097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.
Easton RD; Sholl MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):483-500. PubMed ID: 7738511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disentangling spatial conflicts in mental perspective taking.
Puls K; May M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103078. PubMed ID: 32360790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes.
Carpenter M; Proffitt DR
Mem Cognit; 2001 Apr; 29(3):441-8. PubMed ID: 11407421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.
Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):151-68. PubMed ID: 10682295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
Campos A
Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):454-60. PubMed ID: 22185060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking.
Riecke BE; McNamara TP
Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():1-14. PubMed ID: 28802103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictability of locomotion: effects on updating of spatial situation models during narrative comprehension.
Dutke S; Rinck M
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17225502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imagining projective transformations: aligned orientations in spatial organization.
Pani JR; Jeffres JA; Shippey GT; Schwartz KJ
Cogn Psychol; 1996 Oct; 31(2):125-67. PubMed ID: 8936487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.
Voyer D; Voyer S; Bryden MP
Psychol Bull; 1995 Mar; 117(2):250-70. PubMed ID: 7724690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mental rotation of letters, pictures, and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children.
Rüsseler J; Scholz J; Jordan K; Quaiser-Pohl C
Child Neuropsychol; 2005 Dec; 11(6):497-512. PubMed ID: 16306024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Warrington theory of visual processing and the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery.
Rapport LJ; Millis SR; Bonello PJ
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Apr; 20(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 9777475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations.
Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):247-64. PubMed ID: 10504883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments.
Oman CM; Shebilske WL; Richards JT; Tubre TC; Beall AC; Natapoff A
Spat Cogn Comput; 2002; 2(4):355-72. PubMed ID: 14983834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social effects on reference frame selection.
Kelly JW; Costabile KA; Cherep LA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2339-2345. PubMed ID: 29363061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex differences in components of imagined perspective transformation.
Gardner MR; Sorhus I; Edmonds CJ; Potts R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22426425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body- and environmental-stabilized processing of spatial knowledge.
Mou W; Li X; McNamara TP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 18315416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
