441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11531790)
1. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy.
Wöhrl S; Hemmer W; Focke M; Götz M; Jarisch R
Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 11531790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
Trattner A; David M
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru) - A critical review of the literature and assessment of the significance of positive patch test reactions and the usefulness of restrictive diets.
de Groot AC
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Jun; 80(6):335-353. PubMed ID: 30843216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch test results with patients' own perfumes, deodorants and shaving lotions: results of the IVDK 1998-2002.
Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A; Frosch PJ
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 17309462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact allergy caused by fragrance mix and Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru)--a retrospective study.
Turić P; Lipozencić J; Milavec-Puretić V; Kulisić SM
Coll Antropol; 2011 Mar; 35(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 21661358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in a select North American population.
Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Sasseville D; Marks JG; De Leo VA; Storrs FJ
Dermatitis; 2006 Mar; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 16800274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrances.
Reeder MJ
Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 32475515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propolis, Colophony, and Fragrance Cross-Reactivity and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Shi Y; Nedorost S; Scheman L; Scheman A
Dermatitis; 2016; 27(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 27172306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012.
Frosch PJ; Duus Johansen J; Schuttelaar ML; Silvestre JF; Sánchez-Pérez J; Weisshaar E; Uter W;
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Sep; 73(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 26080686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens.
Vejanurug P; Tresukosol P; Sajjachareonpong P; Puangpet P
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Apr; 74(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 26948414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to balsam of Peru. II. Patch test results in 102 patients with selected balsam of Peru constituents.
Hausen BM
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Jun; 12(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 11381345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with the European baseline series fragrance markers: a 2016 update.
Ung CY; White JML; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Br J Dermatol; 2018 Mar; 178(3):776-780. PubMed ID: 28960261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic workup of fragrance allergy].
Geier J; Uter W
Hautarzt; 2015 Sep; 66(9):674-9. PubMed ID: 26253114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fragrance- and Botanical-Related Allergy and Associated Concomitant Reactions: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2007-2016.
Atwater AR; Ward JM; Liu B; Green CL; Belsito DV; Sasseville D; DeKoven JG; Reeder MJ; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Silverberg JI; Zug KA; Fowler JF; Pratt MD; DeLeo VA; Warshaw EM
Dermatitis; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 33273222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
