These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11533430)

  • 1. Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
    Bowling A; Ebrahim S
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-8. PubMed ID: 11533430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.
    Kennelly C; Bowling A
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-8. PubMed ID: 11533434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.
    Lloyd AJ
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i14-8. PubMed ID: 11533432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.
    Edwards A; Elwyn G
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i9-13. PubMed ID: 11533431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?
    Doyal L
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i29-33. PubMed ID: 11533435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.
    Robinson A; Thomson R
    Qual Health Care; 2001 Sep; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-8. PubMed ID: 11533436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information and participation in decision-making about treatment: a qualitative study of the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Schildmann J; Grunke M; Kalden JR; Vollmann J
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):775-9. PubMed ID: 18974408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Giving the patient a say. No, really.
    Butcher L
    Hosp Health Netw; 2013 May; 87(5):26-31, 1. PubMed ID: 23814949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The doctor advises; the patient decides.
    Bausch DG
    Med Educ; 2010 Mar; 44(3):323. PubMed ID: 20444064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do patients want information if not to take part in decision making?
    Manson NC
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Dec; 36(12):834-7. PubMed ID: 20826868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process.
    Grant CH; Cissna KN; Rosenfeld LB
    Health Commun; 2000; 12(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 10938905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenge of informing patient decision making: what can we tell patients considering long-term mechanical circulatory support about outcomes, daily life, and end-of-life issues?
    Boothroyd LJ; Lambert LJ; Ducharme A; Guertin JR; Sas G; Charbonneau É; Carrier M; Cecere R; Morin JE; Bogaty P
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Jan; 7(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 24425705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consent process: Enabling or disabling patients' active participation?
    Doherty C; Stavropoulou C; Saunders MN; Brown T
    Health (London); 2017 Mar; 21(2):205-222. PubMed ID: 26487687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partnership: doctor and patient: advocacy for informed choice vs. informed consent.
    Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15682004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics.
    Schneider CE
    J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12235687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
    Holmes-Rovner M; Montgomery JS; Rovner DR; Scherer LD; Whitfield J; Kahn VC; Merkle EC; Ubel PA; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26304063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of informed consent in patient complaints: Reducing hidden health system costs and improving patient engagement through shared decision making.
    Posner KL; Severson J; Domino KB
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2015 Sep; 35(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 26418139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectively engaging patients in everyday health-care decisions.
    Satin DJ; Swenson SA; Stovitz SD
    J Fam Pract; 2017 Oct; 66(10):E1-E6. PubMed ID: 28991937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' rights in decision making: the case for personalism versus paternalism in health care.
    Schain WS
    Cancer; 1980 Suppl ): 1035-1041, 15 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 11665278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.
    Nicolai J; Buchholz A; Seefried N; Reuter K; Härter M; Eich W; Bieber C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 May; 99(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26658703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.