324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11533629)
1. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. EU plans to label and trace GMOs.
Dorey E
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):795. PubMed ID: 11533623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulation and exploitation of genetically modified crops.
Kleter GA; van der Krieken WM; Kok EJ; Bosch D; Jordi W; Gilissen LJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1105-10. PubMed ID: 11731773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow my leader.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1103. PubMed ID: 11731770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
Fleck B; Baldock C
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precaution without principle.
Miller HI; Conko G
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):302-3. PubMed ID: 11283575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. GM crops and equivocal environmental benefits.
Johnson B; Hope A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):242. PubMed ID: 10700091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
