These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11534220)

  • 1. Who is a fiduciary?--implications of Supreme Court rulings.
    Mitzner IR; Mehler CV
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Sep; 26(3):33-7. PubMed ID: 11534220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
    Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
    Goodyear J
    Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The states, Congress, or the courts: who will be first to reform ERISA remedies?
    Rooney CD
    Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():73-106. PubMed ID: 10187382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. Supreme Court clarifies that owner-employees are protected by ERISA.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 15500025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time.
    Roeder KH; Rees JS
    GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.
    Butler PA
    State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2004 Aug; 5(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 15298011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
    Ryland BK
    Manag Care Interface; 2004 Oct; 17(10):55-8. PubMed ID: 15535079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court sheds a very narrow light on ERISA.
    Steele CJ
    Bus Health; 1995 Jun; 13(6):79, 83. PubMed ID: 10164761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Workers of the world, panic!
    Parloff R
    Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
    Copeland C; Pierron B
    EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
    Trueman DL
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
    Mariner WK
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subrogation or subterfuge: the myth of ERISA health benefit plans.
    Murphy GF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):309-33. PubMed ID: 12733230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
    Bloche MG
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standing--who may sue under ERISA?--Authorized agent of a fiduciary has no standing. COB Clearinghouse Corporation v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. et al.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(4):76-7. PubMed ID: 16524039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
    Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Apr; (8):1-15. PubMed ID: 12426709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.