These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11534302)

  • 1. Modified fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of perinatal outcome.
    Habek D; Hodek B; Herman R; Maticević A; Jugović D; Habek JC; Salihagić A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Jul; 123(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 11534302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prediction of fetal compromise and acidosis by biophysical profile scoring in the small for gestational age fetus.
    Walkinshaw S; Cameron H; MacPhail S; Robson S
    J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 1453298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a fetal risk assessment score for the prediction of neonatal outcome in the growth-restricted fetus.
    Ott WJ
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1941-4. PubMed ID: 22489827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
    Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile].
    Urbánková E; Toldy M
    Cesk Gynekol; 1989 Dec; 54(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 2698277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal biophysical profile and cerebro-umbilical ratio in assessment of perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses.
    Habek D; Hodek B; Herman R; Jugović D; Cerkez Habek J; Salihagić A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2003; 18(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 12566769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation.
    Alfirevic Z; Walkinshaw SA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Aug; 102(8):638-43. PubMed ID: 7654642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses.
    Cosmi E; Ambrosini G; D'Antona D; Saccardi C; Mari G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 106(6):1240-5. PubMed ID: 16319247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens.
    Baschat AA; Gembruch U; Harman CR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 11844191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antepartum fetal assessment using a fetal biophysical profile score.
    Baskett TF; Gray JH; Prewett SJ; Young LM; Allen AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(5):630-3. PubMed ID: 6702929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses.
    DeVore GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 26113227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superiority of amniotic fluid index over amniotic fluid pocket measurement for predicting bad fetal outcome.
    Youssef AA; Abdulla SA; Sayed EH; Salem HT; Abdelalim AM; Devoe LD
    South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 8465220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA; De Boer MA; Heymans MW; Schoonmade LJ; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; De Groot CJM; Bax CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 51(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 28708272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler.
    Severi FM; Bocchi C; Visentin A; Falco P; Cobellis L; Florio P; Zagonari S; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 11896941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonates and adverse perinatal outcome by fetoplacental Doppler at 37 weeks' gestation.
    Triunfo S; Crispi F; Gratacos E; Figueras F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 27241184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.