These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1153606)

  • 1. The effects of a dexamphetamine-amylobarbitone sodium mixture on the reward value of different sensory changes.
    Glow PH; Russell A
    Psychopharmacologia; 1975; 41(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 1153606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of dexamphetamine, amylobarbitone sodium and their mixture on sensory contingent bar pressing behaviour in the rat.
    Glow PH; Russell A
    Psychopharmacologia; 1973 Jul; 31(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 4732727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drug enhanced sensory contingent bar pressing: comparing the effect of contingent and noncontingent sensory change.
    Glow PH; Russell A
    Psychopharmacologia; 1973 Sep; 32(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 4762236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sodium amylobarbitone, the partial reinforcement extinction effect, and the frustration effect in the double runway.
    Gray JA; Dudderidge H
    Neuropharmacology; 1971 Mar; 10(21):217-22. PubMed ID: 5093961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extinction of fear. I. Effects of amylobarbitone and dexamphetamine given separately and in combination on fear and exploratory behaviour in rats.
    Kumar R
    Psychopharmacologia; 1971; 19(2):163-87. PubMed ID: 5565737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sodium amobarbital, the hippocampal theta rhythm, and the partial reinforcement extinction effect.
    Gray JA
    Psychol Rev; 1970 Sep; 77(5):465-80. PubMed ID: 5506814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sodium amylobarbitone and responses to nonreward.
    Feldon J; Guillamon A; Gray JA; De Wit H; McNaughton N
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Feb; 31(1):19-50. PubMed ID: 424505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A progressive ratio schedule of self-stimulation testing in rats reveals profound augmentation of d-amphetamine reward by food restriction but no effect of a "sensitizing" regimen of d-amphetamine.
    Cabeza de Vaca S; Krahne LL; Carr KD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Aug; 175(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 14985931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement.
    Donny EC; Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Evans-Martin FF; Booth S; Gharib MA; Clements LA; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Aug; 169(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 12774186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of sodium amylobarbitone and dexamphetamine sulphate on the peripheral visual field.
    HOLLAND HC
    J Ment Sci; 1960 Oct; 106():1438-42. PubMed ID: 13715275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.
    Beninger RJ; Hanson DR; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 69(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 6106257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The D1 agonist SKF 38393 attenuates amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats.
    Ranaldi R; Pantalony D; Beninger RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995 Sep; 52(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 7501655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The behavior of worker and non-worker rats under the influence of (-) 9 -trans-tetrahydrocannabinol, chlorpromazine and amylobarbitone.
    Masur J; Märtz RM; Carlini EA
    Psychopharmacologia; 1972; 25(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 5038983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pairing stimuli with reinforcement on multiple schedule performance of children.
    Birnbrauer JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 5150046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MUTUAL POTENTIATION OF AMPHETAMINE AND AMYLOBARBITONE MEASURED BY ACTIVITY IN RATS.
    RUSHTON R; STEINBERG H
    Br J Pharmacol Chemother; 1963 Oct; 21(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 14081660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amobarbital and the partial reinforcement effects in rats: isolating frustrative control over instrumental responding.
    Capaldi EJ; Sparling DL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Mar; 74(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 5546887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat exhibit differential activity to conditioned reinforcers and primary reinforcers within a second-order schedule of saccharin reinforcement.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(10):2777-88. PubMed ID: 15548221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploratory response habituation and the attenuating effect of an amphetamine-barbiturate mixture.
    Cooper SJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1976 Aug; 49(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.