These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11536127)

  • 1. Strain selection of Metarrhizium anisopliae by image analysis of colony morphology for consistency of steroid biotransformation.
    Yang K; Wang J; Li X; Feng X; Duan S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2001 Oct; 75(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11536127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
    Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features.
    Lopes R; Ayache A; Makni N; Puech P; Villers A; Mordon S; Betrouni N
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 21361178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Monofractal, Multifractal and gray level Co-occurrence matrix algorithms in analysis of Breast tumor microscopic images for prognosis of distant metastasis risk.
    Rajković N; Kolarević D; Kanjer K; Milošević NT; Nikolić-Vukosavljević D; Radulovic M
    Biomed Microdevices; 2016 Oct; 18(5):83. PubMed ID: 27549346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
    Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multifractal framework based on blanket method.
    Paskaš MP; Reljin IS; Reljin BD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():894546. PubMed ID: 24578664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zygosporin D and two new cytochalasins produced by the fungus Metarrhizium anisopliae.
    Fujii Y; Tani H; Ichinoe M; Nakajima H
    J Nat Prod; 2000 Jan; 63(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 10650095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Classification of HEp-2 Cell Patterns Using Fractal Descriptor.
    Xu R; Sun Y; Yang Z; Song B; Hu X
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2015 Jul; 14(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 26011888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical fractal models based on GND-PCA and its application on classification of liver diseases.
    Jiang H; Feng T; Zhao D; Yang B; Zhang L; Chen Y
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():656391. PubMed ID: 24224174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive automated 3D thyroid lesion classification in ultrasound: a class of ThyroScan™ systems.
    Acharya UR; Vinitha Sree S; Krishnan MM; Molinari F; Garberoglio R; Suri JS
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Apr; 52(4):508-20. PubMed ID: 22154208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic liver tissues classification by fractal feature vector based on M-band wavelet transform.
    Lee WL; Chen YC; Hsieh KS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 12760555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review.
    Lopes R; Betrouni N
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Aug; 13(4):634-49. PubMed ID: 19535282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A support vector machine classifier reduces interscanner variation in the HRCT classification of regional disease pattern in diffuse lung disease: comparison to a Bayesian classifier.
    Chang Y; Lim J; Kim N; Seo JB; Lynch DA
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051912. PubMed ID: 23635282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wagner RF; Hadjiiski L
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1509-22. PubMed ID: 10947254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multifractal feature descriptor for histopathology.
    Atupelage C; Nagahashi H; Yamaguchi M; Sakamoto M; Hashiguchi A
    Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2012; 35(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22101185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational grading of hepatocellular carcinoma using multifractal feature description.
    Atupelage C; Nagahashi H; Yamaguchi M; Abe T; Hashiguchi A; Sakamoto M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013 Jan; 37(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 23141965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring multifractal-based features for mild Alzheimer's disease classification.
    Ni H; Zhou L; Ning X; Wang L;
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 26193379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT.
    Lee J; Nishikawa RM; Reiser I; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1846-1856. PubMed ID: 28295405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.