These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Parasuraman R; Mouloua M; Molloy R Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 11536753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback strategies for visual search in airframe structural inspection. Gramopadhye AK; Drury CG; Sharit J Int J Ind Ergon; 1997 May; 19(5):333-44. PubMed ID: 11540601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of task demand characteristics on workload and performance. Hancock PA; Williams G; Manning CM; Miyake S Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(1):63-86. PubMed ID: 11541497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining control input with flight path data to evaluate pilot performance in transport aircraft. Ebbatson M; Harris D; Huddlestone J; Sears R Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 Nov; 79(11):1061-4. PubMed ID: 18998489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of workload preview on task scheduling during simulated instrument flight. Andre AD; Heers ST; Cashion PA Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 11541496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment. Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Review of visual display system in flight simulator]. Xie GH; Wei SN Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2003 Jun; 16(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 12934618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A feedback intervention to increase digital and paper checklist performance in technically advanced aircraft simulation. Rantz WG; Van Houten R J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 21541133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated cockpits special report, part 2. Aviat Week Space Technol; 1995 Feb; 142(6):48-57. PubMed ID: 11542398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Above-real-time training (ARTT) improves transfer to a simulated flight control task. Donderi DC; Niall KK; Fish K; Goldstein B Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):469-79. PubMed ID: 22768647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of eye movement and cognition during simulated landing of aircraft. Liu ZQ; Yuan XG; Liu W; Wang R Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2002 Oct; 15(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 12449149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Miller CA; Parasuraman R Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 17315844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Stout RJ; Salas E; Fowlkes JE Group Dyn; 1997 Jun; 1(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 11540606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can a glass cockpit display help (or hinder) performance of novices in simulated flight training? Wright S; O'Hare D Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():292-9. PubMed ID: 25480000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view. Barfield W; Rosenberg C; Furness TA 3rd Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(3):233-56. PubMed ID: 11541915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-power graphic computers for visual simulation: a real-time--rendering revolution. Kaiser MK Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1996 May; 28(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 11540137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]