These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11536753)

  • 21. Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance.
    Bowers C; Thornton C; Braun C; Morgan BB; Salas E
    Mil Psychol; 1998; 10(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 11541776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of automation reliability on error detection and attention to auditory stimuli in a multi-tasking environment.
    Ferraro JC; Mouloua M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Feb; 91():103303. PubMed ID: 33176254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics; 2009 May; 52(5):512-23. PubMed ID: 19296323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Task partitioning effects in semi-automated human-machine system performance.
    Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(9):1387-99. PubMed ID: 24020751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of conflict alerting system reliability and task difficulty on pilots' conflict detection with cockpit display of traffic information.
    Xu X; Wickens CD; Rantanen EM
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 17178655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Return-to-Manual Performance can be Predicted Before Automation Fails.
    Griffiths N; Bowden V; Wee S; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1333-1349. PubMed ID: 36538745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance enhancement in an uninhabited air vehicle task using psychophysiologically determined adaptive aiding.
    Wilson GF; Russell CA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1005-18. PubMed ID: 18074700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Procedural errors in air traffic control: effects of traffic density, expertise, and automation.
    Di Nocera F; Fabrizi R; Terenzi M; Ferlazzo F
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jun; 77(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16780243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.
    Szalma JL; Taylor GS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 21688932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Design and test of a situation-augmented display for an unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring task.
    Lu JL; Horng RY; Chao CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug; 117(1):1187-207. PubMed ID: 24422345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress.
    Sauer J; Kao CS; Wastell D; Nickel P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):755-66. PubMed ID: 21846313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining electrodermal responses and cardiovascular measures for probing adaptive automation during simulated flight.
    Haarmann A; Boucsein W; Schaefer F
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1026-40. PubMed ID: 19520358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of adaptive and adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress.
    Sauer J; Kao CS; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(8):840-53. PubMed ID: 22506767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study.
    Wohleber RW; Matthews G; Lin J; Szalma JL; Calhoun GL; Funke GJ; Chiu CP; Ruff HA
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 30265579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 17702209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.