These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11536851)

  • 1. Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display.
    Martin-Emerson R; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 1997 Dec; 39(4):581-601. PubMed ID: 11536851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
    Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathway HUDs: are they viable?
    Fadden S; Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):173-93. PubMed ID: 11592660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Highways in the Sky and a virtual pad for landing Head Up Display symbology to enable improved helicopter pilots situation awareness and workload in degraded visual conditions.
    Stanton NA; Plant KL; Roberts AP; Allison CK
    Ergonomics; 2019 Feb; 62(2):255-267. PubMed ID: 29206624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
    Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synthetic vision systems: the effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view.
    Alexander AL; Wickens CD; Hardy TJ
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):693-707. PubMed ID: 16553060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. United States Air Force head-up display control and performance symbology evaluations.
    Weinstein LF; Gillingham KK; Ercoline WR
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 May; 65(5 Suppl):A20-30. PubMed ID: 8018075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived clutter in advanced cockpit displays: measurement and modeling with experienced pilots.
    Kaber DB; Alexander AL; Stelzer EM; Kim SH; Kaufmann K; Hsiang S
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 Nov; 79(11):1007-18. PubMed ID: 18998481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view.
    Barfield W; Rosenberg C; Furness TA 3rd
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(3):233-56. PubMed ID: 11541915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-Flight Study of Helmet-Mounted Symbology System Concepts in Degraded Visual Environments.
    Cheung B; Craig G; Steels B; Sceviour R; Cosman V; Jennings S; Holst P
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2015 Aug; 86(8):714-22. PubMed ID: 26387895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of overlay symbology in night vision goggles on accommodation and attention shift.
    Schor CM; Task HL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1039-47. PubMed ID: 8908341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of control reversal errors during unusual attitude recoveries using helmet-mounted display symbology.
    Liggett KK; Gallimore JJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Feb; 73(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 11846178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multidimensional measure of display clutter and pilot performance for advanced head-up display.
    Kim SH; Prinzel LJ; Kaber DB; Alexander AL; Stelzer EM; Kaufmann K; Veil T
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2011 Nov; 82(11):1013-22. PubMed ID: 22097635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space, and object display on information integration.
    Wickens CD; Andre AD
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 2376408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology.
    Wickens CD; Goh J; Helleberg J; Horrey WJ; Talleur DA
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):360-80. PubMed ID: 14702989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
    Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays.
    Begault DR; Pittman MT
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 11539173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: effects of frame of reference and dimensionality.
    Wickens CD; Liang CC; Prevett T; Olmos O
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(3):241-71. PubMed ID: 11540139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.