These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1153755)

  • 1. Visual detection and localization of radiographic images.
    Starr SJ; Metz CE; Lusted LB; Goodenough DJ
    Radiology; 1975 Sep; 116(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 1153755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach.
    Metz CE; Starr SJ; Lusted LB
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 981610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
    Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
    Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A perceptually relevant channelized joint observer (PCJO) for the detection-localization of parametric signals.
    Zhang L; Cavaro-Ménard C; Le Callet P; Tanguy JY
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1875-88. PubMed ID: 22736639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic applications of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Goodenough DJ; Rossmann K; Lusted LB
    Radiology; 1974 Jan; 110(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 4808546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search and nonsearch protocols for radiographic consultation.
    Swensson RG; Theodore GH
    Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 2244000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
    Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography.
    Li HD; Kallergi M; Clarke LP; Jain VK; Clark RA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(3):565-76. PubMed ID: 18215861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
    Metz CE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance?
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 17368216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
    Chakraborty DP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can order of report prevent satisfaction of search in abdominal contrast studies?
    Berbaum KS; Franken EA; Dorfman DD; Caldwell RT; Lu CH
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 15691728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.