451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11540632)
1. Comparative performance of Colisure.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative performance of Colisure (TM) and accepted methods in the detection of chlorine-injured total coliforms and E.coli.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
Water Sci Technol; 1995; 31(5-6):259-61. PubMed ID: 11539133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chlorine injury and the comparative performance of Colisure (TM), ColiLert (TM) and ColiQuik (TM) for the enumeration of coliform bacteria and E.coli in drinking water.
McFeters GA; Pyle BH; Gillis SJ; Acomb CJ; Ferrazza D
Water Sci Technol; 1993; 27(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11537608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fluorogenic and conventional membrane filter media for enumerating coliform bacteria.
Cenci G; De Bartolomeo A; Caldini G
Microbios; 1993; 76(306):47-54. PubMed ID: 8264433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health significance and occurrence of injured bacteria in drinking water.
McFeters GA; LeChevallier MW; Singh A; Kippin JS
Water Sci Technol; 1986; 18(10):227-31. PubMed ID: 11539721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparison of BRILA-MUG and lauryl sulfate-MUG bouillon as detection media for total and fecal coliform bacteria in bathing waters in conformity with the Economic Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Holländer R; Köppe FG; von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1993 Nov; 195(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8117394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of beta-D-galactosidase and beta-D-glucuronidase activities for quantitative detection of total and fecal coliforms in wastewater.
George I; Crop P; Servais P
Can J Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 47(7):670-5. PubMed ID: 11547888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.
Fricker CR; Eldred BJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 19874482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of bacterial coliform occurrences in different zones of a drinking water distribution system.
Blanch AR; Galofré B; Lucena F; Terradillos A; Vilanova X; Ribas F
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 102(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 17309620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluorogenic detection of atypical coliforms from water samples.
Cenci G; Caldini G; Sfodera F; Morozzi G
Microbiologica; 1990 Apr; 13(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 2112678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new medium for the enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in Japanese surface waters.
Kodaka H; Mizuochi S; Saito M; Matsuoka H
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 104(4):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17976170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of BGB-MUG and LSTB-MUG in microbiological surveillance of recreational waters.
Höller C; Havemeister G; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 9353533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Growth behavior of Enterobacteriaceae in BRILA-MUG-broth and in different modifications of broth].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Havemeister G; Heinemeyer EA; von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Aug; 193(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 1382430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.
Hörman A; Hänninen ML
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3249-56. PubMed ID: 16916531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Coli-ID and MUG Plus media for recovering Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria from groundwater samples.
Sueiro RA; Araujo M; Santos CJ; Gómez MJ; Garrido MJ
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(12):213-6. PubMed ID: 11464759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A combined chromogenic-fluorogenic medium for the simultaneous detection of coliform groups and E. coli in water].
Manafi M; Kneifel W
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Dec; 189(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 2697207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of rapid enzyme assay techniques for monitoring of microbial water quality.
Fiksdal L; Tryland I
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2008 Jun; 19(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 18486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An enzymatic procedure for the confirmation of total coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration from water.
Giammanco G; Pignato S; Biondi M
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Aug; 193(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 1388620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
