These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11542646)

  • 1. Surgical evaluation of candidates for cochlear implants.
    Black FO; Lilly DJ; Fowler LP; Stypulkowski PH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1987; 96(1 Pt 2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11542646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implants and electrical brainstem stimulation in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A
    Curr Opin Neurol; 1999 Feb; 12(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10097883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implants.
    Courville T
    J S C Med Assoc; 1994 Oct; 90(10):491-3. PubMed ID: 7990422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technique and indications for the French multichannel cochlear implant "Chorimac-12" for total deafness rehabilitation.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B
    Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3839632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implants in young children.
    Niparko JK; Blankenhorn R
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 14648819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological findings in two bilateral cochlear implant cases: does the duration of deafness affect electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses?
    Thai-Van H; Gallego S; Truy E; Veuillet E; Collet L
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2002 Nov; 111(11):1008-14. PubMed ID: 12450176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear Implantation in Otosclerosis: Surgical and Auditory Outcomes With a Brief on Facial Nerve Stimulation.
    Vashishth A; Fulcheri A; Rossi G; Prasad SC; Caruso A; Sanna M
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e345-e353. PubMed ID: 28902803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perfusion SPECT in cochlear implantation and promontory stimulation.
    Allen A; Barnes A; Singh RS; Patterson J; Hadley DM; Wyper D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 May; 25(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 15100513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Traditional and emerging indications in cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.
    Cervera-Paz FJ; Manrique MJ
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16496561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric cochlear implantation: expanding applications and outcomes.
    Russell JL; Pine HS; Young DL
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2013 Aug; 60(4):841-63. PubMed ID: 23905823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of round-window and transtympanic promontory electric stimulation in cochlear implant candidates.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Kemink JL
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 1487088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implant rehabilitation outcomes in Waardenburg syndrome children.
    de Sousa Andrade SM; Monteiro AR; Martins JH; Alves MC; Santos Silva LF; Quadros JM; Ribeiro CA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1375-8. PubMed ID: 22784507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploratory cochleotomy. Assessment of auditory nerve excitability and anatomical conditions in cochlear implant candidates.
    Montandon P; Kasper A; Pelizzone M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 1475098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CHARGE syndrome and Cochlear implantation: difficulties and outcomes in the paediatric population.
    Birman CS; Brew JA; Gibson WP; Elliott EJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 25649713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. History of cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants.
    Møller AR
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 16891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.