These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11544789)

  • 1. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
    Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Preliminary study of treatment mechanism and stability in deep overbite malocclusion with hyperdivergent and hypodivergent skeletal pattern].
    Liu Y; Xu TM; Yang MZ; Lin JX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 Aug; 37(4):425-8. PubMed ID: 16086068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
    Lineberger MW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Herberger T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with multiloop edgewise arch wire and modified Class III elastics by maxillary mini-implant anchorage.
    He S; Gao J; Wamalwa P; Wang Y; Zou S; Chen S
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):630-40. PubMed ID: 23311602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
    Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.