These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11545148)

  • 1. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Kim DO; Dorn PA; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Mar; 2(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.
    Meinke DK; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 208(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 16019174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in the groups of older people with presbyacusis and young people with normal hearing].
    Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Lisowska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11070698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE in humans: binaural and contralateral stimulation effects.
    Bassim MK; Miller RL; Buss E; Smith DW
    Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 182(1-2):140-52. PubMed ID: 12948609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L; Zettner E; Chang Liu M; Meuel Fernhoff C; MacPhee I; Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Thompson S; Henin S; Long GR
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Steffens T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.
    Burke SR; Rogers AR; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 20458246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.