These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11545356)

  • 21. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Membrane technology applied to acid mine drainage from copper mining.
    Ambiado K; Bustos C; Schwarz A; Bórquez R
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):705-715. PubMed ID: 28192364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application.
    Koyuncu I; Topacik D
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15137719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds from water sources using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Comparison of removal efficiencies and in-depth analysis of rejection mechanisms.
    Matin A; Jillani SMS; Baig U; Ihsanullah I; Alhooshani K
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117682. PubMed ID: 37003228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Controlled TiO
    Zhou X; Zhao YY; Kim SR; Elimelech M; Hu S; Kim JH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(24):14311-14320. PubMed ID: 30516046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling pH variation in reverse osmosis.
    Nir O; Bishop NF; Lahav O; Freger V
    Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():328-35. PubMed ID: 26447944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recovery of clindamycin from fermentation wastewater with nanofiltration membranes.
    Zhu A; Zhu W; Wu Z; Jing Y
    Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3718-32. PubMed ID: 12867340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
    Zhou W; Song L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Membrane filtration for tertiary treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry.
    Mänttäri M; Nyström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):99-107. PubMed ID: 17486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of the extent of bacterial growth in reverse osmosis system for improving drinking water quality.
    Park SK; Hu JY
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(8):968-77. PubMed ID: 20512722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
    Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Salt and Water Transport in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Beyond the Solution-Diffusion Model.
    Wang L; Cao T; Dykstra JE; Porada S; Biesheuvel PM; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 55(24):16665-16675. PubMed ID: 34879196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of volume retarded osmosis - Low pressure membrane hybrid process for recovery of heavy metals in acid mine drainage.
    Choi J; Im SJ; Jang A
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 232():264-272. PubMed ID: 31154187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment of landfill leachates by nanofiltration.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1209-17. PubMed ID: 20149518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment.
    Nghiem LD; Schäfer AI; Waite TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):265-72. PubMed ID: 12361019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relating rejection of trace organic contaminants to membrane properties in forward osmosis: measurements, modelling and implications.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():265-74. PubMed ID: 24345822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A sustainable novel approach of recycling end-of-life reverse osmosis (RO) membrane as additives in concrete and mathematical model with response surface methodology (RSM).
    Neelamegam P; Muthusubramanian B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(13):19304-19328. PubMed ID: 38355865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.