These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11545602)

  • 1. SuperStar: comparison of CSD and PDB-based interaction fields as a basis for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Boer DR; Kroon J; Cole JC; Smith B; Verdonk ML
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Sep; 312(1):275-87. PubMed ID: 11545602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):1093-108. PubMed ID: 10369784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
    Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PDB-Ligand: a ligand database based on PDB for the automated and customized classification of ligand-binding structures.
    Shin JM; Cho DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D238-41. PubMed ID: 15608186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions.
    Deng Z; Chuaqui C; Singh J
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 14711306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of composite crystal-field environments in molecular recognition and the de novo design of protein ligands.
    Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Mar; 237(2):212-35. PubMed ID: 8126735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
    Gohlke H; Hendlich M; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 10623530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure.
    Bordner AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18940825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.
    Zhong S; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2303-15. PubMed ID: 17900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria.
    Peters KP; Fauck J; Frömmel C
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 256(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 8609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A fragment library based on Gaussian mixtures predicting favorable molecular interactions.
    Rantanen VV; Denessiouk KA; Gyllenberg M; Koski T; Johnson MS
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Oct; 313(1):197-214. PubMed ID: 11601856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric and chemical patterns of interaction in protein--ligand complexes and their application in docking.
    Moreno E; León K
    Proteins; 2002 Apr; 47(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11870860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crystal structure of a glutamate/aspartate binding protein complexed with a glutamate molecule: structural basis of ligand specificity at atomic resolution.
    Hu Y; Fan CP; Fu G; Zhu D; Jin Q; Wang DC
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Sep; 382(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18640128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition.
    Sarkhel S; Desiraju GR
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 14696187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling of metal interaction geometries for protein-ligand docking.
    Seebeck B; Reulecke I; Kämper A; Rarey M
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1237-54. PubMed ID: 18041759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.