169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11545684)
1. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study.
Fortin JM; Hirota LK; Bond BE; O'Connor AM; Col NF
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2001; 1():2. PubMed ID: 11545684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study.
Brundage M; Leis A; Bezjak A; Feldman-Stewart D; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
Qual Life Res; 2003 Jun; 12(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 12797712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences.
Dolan JG; Iadarola S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18402680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study.
Hill S; Spink J; Cadilhac D; Edwards A; Kaufman C; Rogers S; Ryan R; Tonkin A
BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():108. PubMed ID: 20199692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making.
Epstein RM; Alper BS; Quill TE
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(19):2359-66. PubMed ID: 15150208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.
Kuijpers W; Giesinger JM; Zabernigg A; Young T; Friend E; Tomaszewska IM; Aaronson NK; Holzner B
Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26353905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes?
McNair AG; Brookes ST; Davis CR; Argyropoulos M; Blazeby JM
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 20065187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Communication of Global Cardiovascular Risk by Avatars.
Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Karanam C; Krishnamurthy D; Niño L; Anam R; Sharit J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():341-4. PubMed ID: 27046602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: a randomized trial.
Carling CL; Kristoffersen DT; Montori VM; Herrin J; Schünemann HJ; Treweek S; Akl EA; Oxman AD
PLoS Med; 2009 Aug; 6(8):e1000134. PubMed ID: 19707575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Preferred Risk Formats Lead to Better Understanding? A Multicenter Controlled Trial on Communicating Familial Breast Cancer Risks Using Different Risk Formats.
Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Claassen L; Timmermans DR
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2020; 14():333-342. PubMed ID: 32109999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment.
Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Brennan-Martinez C; McGonegal M; Levine R
Am J Med; 2012 Nov; 125(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22939094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.
Smit AK; Keogh LA; Hersch J; Newson AJ; Butow P; Williams G; Cust AE
Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1203-1214. PubMed ID: 26332492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
