These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11545684)
1. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study. Fortin JM; Hirota LK; Bond BE; O'Connor AM; Col NF BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2001; 1():2. PubMed ID: 11545684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial. Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study. Brundage M; Leis A; Bezjak A; Feldman-Stewart D; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J Qual Life Res; 2003 Jun; 12(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 12797712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences. Dolan JG; Iadarola S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18402680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study. Hill S; Spink J; Cadilhac D; Edwards A; Kaufman C; Rogers S; Ryan R; Tonkin A BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():108. PubMed ID: 20199692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences. Price M; Cameron R; Butow P Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt? Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. Kuijpers W; Giesinger JM; Zabernigg A; Young T; Friend E; Tomaszewska IM; Aaronson NK; Holzner B Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26353905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients. Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes? McNair AG; Brookes ST; Davis CR; Argyropoulos M; Blazeby JM J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 20065187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Communication of Global Cardiovascular Risk by Avatars. Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Karanam C; Krishnamurthy D; Niño L; Anam R; Sharit J Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():341-4. PubMed ID: 27046602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: a randomized trial. Carling CL; Kristoffersen DT; Montori VM; Herrin J; Schünemann HJ; Treweek S; Akl EA; Oxman AD PLoS Med; 2009 Aug; 6(8):e1000134. PubMed ID: 19707575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Preferred Risk Formats Lead to Better Understanding? A Multicenter Controlled Trial on Communicating Familial Breast Cancer Risks Using Different Risk Formats. Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Claassen L; Timmermans DR Patient Prefer Adherence; 2020; 14():333-342. PubMed ID: 32109999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats. Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment. Tait AR; Voepel-Lewis T; Brennan-Martinez C; McGonegal M; Levine R Am J Med; 2012 Nov; 125(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 22939094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study. Smit AK; Keogh LA; Hersch J; Newson AJ; Butow P; Williams G; Cust AE Health Expect; 2016 Dec; 19(6):1203-1214. PubMed ID: 26332492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]