482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11547646)
1. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's triage and management preferences for cervical cytologic reports demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Ferris DG; Kriegel D; Cote L; Litaker M; Woodward L
Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9225706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and management of the AGUS Papanicolaou smear.
Kaferle JE; Malouin JM
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jun; 63(11):2239-44. PubMed ID: 11417776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic.
Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG
WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervicography for evaluating the "atypical" Papanicolaou smear.
August N
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2010901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
