These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548034)

  • 21. Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey.
    Meftah el-M; Shenasa J; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Dec; 88(6):3133-49. PubMed ID: 12466436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Nature; 2000 Oct; 407(6806):906-8. PubMed ID: 11057669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
    Wahn B; König P
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audiovisual prior entry.
    Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Jun; 381(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15896473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.
    Lipp OV; Siddle DA; Dall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):452-61. PubMed ID: 9643060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention to olfaction. A psychophysical investigation.
    Spence C; McGlone FP; Kettenmann B; Kobal G
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11465740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
    Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Green J; Ward LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.