128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548341)
1. Patient dose reduction in CT examinations by optimising scanogram acquisition.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Voloudaki A; Papadakis A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 93(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 11548341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Tube Voltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study on Radiation Dose and Image Quality.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2019 May; 54(5):265-272. PubMed ID: 30562273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SU-E-I-43: Reducing Scanogram Dose Without Affecting the Planned Tube Current Modulation of a Diagnostic Abdomen/pelvis CT Scan.
Zhang D; Angel E
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3634-3635. PubMed ID: 28519492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations.
Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
Koller F; Roth J
Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential for radiation dose savings in abdominal and chest CT using automatic tube voltage selection in combination with automatic tube current modulation.
Mayer C; Meyer M; Fink C; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Schoenberg SO; Henzler T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25055262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Karantanas A; Karabekios S; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17500447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. COMPARISON OF ORGAN-BASED TUBE CURRENT MODULATION AND BISMUTH SHIELDING IN CHEST CT: EFFECT ON THE IMAGE QUALITY AND THE PATIENT DOSE.
Kotiaho A; Manninen AL; Nikkinen J; Nieminen MT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Nov; 185(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 30544171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
