130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548688)
1. Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply.
Edwards SJ
BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7309):390-1. PubMed ID: 11548688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubation.
Inwald D; Vandyck W
BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7309):389-90. PubMed ID: 11548686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Are we treading a fine line?
Street K; Henderson J
BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7309):388-9. PubMed ID: 11509434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. The parents perspective on withdrawing treatment.
Greig-Midlane H
BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7309):390. PubMed ID: 11548687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in children.
Wellesley H; Jenkins IA
Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 19(10):972-8. PubMed ID: 19754487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Doctrine of double effect should be discarded.
Biegler P
BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7323):1248. PubMed ID: 11758516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. End-of-life decisions and respiratory disease.
Prigmore S
Nurs Times; 2006 Feb 14-20; 102(7):56, 59, 61. PubMed ID: 16512052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Double effect is different from euthanasia.
McIntosh N
BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7323):1248-9. PubMed ID: 11758517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assisted dying and the principle of double effect].
Klein M
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2002 Jun; 114(10-11):415-21. PubMed ID: 12708098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding and withdrawing medical treatment: an emergency medicine perspective.
Iserson KV
Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8669739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Withholding and withdrawing treatment, ethical and legal aspects].
Pedersen R; Bahus MK; Kvisle EM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1648-50. PubMed ID: 17571104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The euthanasia war: last rights -- human beings do not start their own life; do they have the right to invite a doctor to end it? The pros and cons of doctor-assisted suicide.
Economist; 1997 Jun; 343(8022):21-4. PubMed ID: 11657068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: ethical considerations.
Reynolds S; Cooper AB; McKneally M
Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):919-36, viii. PubMed ID: 17888789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Euthanasia may be ethical, but it is not legal.
Woodcock T
BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7323):1248. PubMed ID: 11758515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Defending the sanctity of life principle: a reply to John Keown.
McGee A
J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):820-34. PubMed ID: 21774277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawing may be preferable to withholding.
Vincent JL
Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 9(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 15987405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome and ethics in severe brain damage.
Vincent JL
Prog Brain Res; 2005; 150():555-63. PubMed ID: 16186049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two challenges to the double effect doctrine: euthanasia and abortion.
Shaw AB
J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 11934939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical futility: interpretation and ethical ramifications for the perioperative nurse.
Schroeter K
Semin Perioper Nurs; 1997 Jul; 6(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 9295756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competent patients with advanced states of permanent paralysis have the right to forgo life-sustaining therapy.
Bernat JL; Cranford RE; Kittredge FI; Rosenberg RN
Neurology; 1993 Jan; 43(1):224-5. PubMed ID: 8423894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
