These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548785)

  • 1. Objective and subjective assessment of a new diffractive trifocal contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Belkin M
    Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985); 1996-1997; 19-20():41-4. PubMed ID: 11548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Avraham G; Belkin M
    CLAO J; 1996 Oct; 22(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 8906381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the Tangent Streak trifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 1893537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact lens correction of presbyopia.
    Bennett ES
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 May; 91(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 18201225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
    Mojzis P; Kukuckova L; Majerova K; Liehneova K; Piñero DP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):666-72. PubMed ID: 25291749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles.
    Sanislo S; Wicker D; Green DG
    CLAO J; 1992 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.
    Mojzis P; Peña-García P; Liehneova I; Ziak P; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jan; 40(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 24355721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.
    Tilia D; Munro A; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Kho D; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
    J Optom; 2017; 10(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 27161603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An objective and subjective comparative analysis of diffractive and front surface aspheric contact lens designs used to correct presbyopia.
    Brenner MB
    CLAO J; 1994 Jan; 20(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8149568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Amrizal H; Diec J; Yeotikar N; Jong M; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30451806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.