These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548785)

  • 21. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Flores M; Gaib S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 24184091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of four multifocal contact lenses in young monocular aphakic patients.
    Conklin JD; Litteral G; Schmeisser ET; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Apr; 18(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 1606680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical experience with the Tangent Streak RGP bifocal contact lens.
    Josephson JE; Wong M; Caffery BE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 2708764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Llorente-Guillemot A; García-Lazaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Perez-Cambrodi RJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22070196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual outcomes of a trifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with microincision cataract surgery.
    Alió JL; Montalbán R; Peña-García P; Soria FA; Vega-Estrada A
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 29(11):756-61. PubMed ID: 24203807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical assessment of the piggyback bifocal contact lens system.
    Vredevoogd LJ; Litteral G; Bierly JR; Cordahi G
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 10073635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Yaylali SA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 20691422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Chu R; Stahl J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 158(3):436-46.e1. PubMed ID: 24932989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the NOVAWET-Perception bifocal contact lens.
    Anderson CW; Bierly JR; Litteral G; Gross J; Hainsworth D
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8728616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Sha J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jul; 45(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 30601291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Freeman MH; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 17289423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.