These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11548930)

  • 1. An innovative digital imaging set-up allowing a low-dose approach to phase contrast applications in the medical field.
    Olivo A; Arfelli F; Cantatore G; Longo R; Menk RH; Pani S; Prest M; Poropat P; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vallazza E; Castelli E
    Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1610-9. PubMed ID: 11548930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical implementation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging: theoretical foundations and design considerations.
    Wu X; Liu H
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2169-79. PubMed ID: 12945983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-dose phase contrast x-ray medical imaging.
    Arfelli F; Assante M; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2845-52. PubMed ID: 9814522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.
    Huda W; Nickoloff EL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5713-28. PubMed ID: 19175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3367-74. PubMed ID: 16370424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: detectors with high voltage protection.
    Zhao W; Law J; Waechter D; Huang Z; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 9571622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics.
    Bravin A; Coan P; Suortti P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):R1-35. PubMed ID: 23220766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of x-ray differential phase contrast computed tomography (PCT) with respect to medical imaging.
    Raupach R; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4761-74. PubMed ID: 22894401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A GPU Simulation Tool for Training and Optimisation in 2D Digital X-Ray Imaging.
    Gallio E; Rampado O; Gianaria E; Bianchi SD; Ropolo R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141497. PubMed ID: 26545097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography: physical principles and future applications.
    Gambaccini M; Baldelli P
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):454-64; quiz 465-6. PubMed ID: 14735011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of image quality in conventional and digital mammography taking into account dynamic range.
    Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):380-2. PubMed ID: 15933141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.
    Nykänen K; Siltanen S
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1864-73. PubMed ID: 12906205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging technique for material and medical science applications.
    Kashyap YS; Yadav PS; Roy T; Sarkar PS; Shukla M; Sinha A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1083-90. PubMed ID: 18313312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advanced phase-contrast imaging using a grating interferometer.
    McDonald SA; Marone F; Hintermüller C; Mikuljan G; David C; Pfeiffer F; Stampanoni M
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2009 Jul; 16(Pt 4):562-72. PubMed ID: 19535872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priorities in optimisation of medical X-ray imaging--a contribution to the debate.
    Månsson LG; Båth M; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 15933125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling the elastic scattering in diagnostic radiology: the importance of structure form factors.
    Cardoso SC; Gonçalves OD; Schechter H; Eichler J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1907-16. PubMed ID: 12884924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.