These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11549868)

  • 21. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Rutherford SE; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Jacobs N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):353-6. PubMed ID: 3306497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Antepartum fetal surveillance in the patient with decreased fetal movement.
    Ahn MO; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Jacobs N; Rutherford SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):860-4. PubMed ID: 3314515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s.
    Miller DA; Rabello YA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 174(3):812-7. PubMed ID: 8633648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
    Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death.
    Clark SL; Sabey P; Jolley K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 160(3):694-7. PubMed ID: 2929695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labor.
    Vintzileos AM; Gaffney SE; Salinger LM; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 70(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 3601282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters.
    Baschat AA; Viscardi RM; Hussey-Gardner B; Hashmi N; Harman C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19072744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction.
    Baschat AA; Galan HL; Lee W; DeVore GR; Mari G; Hobbins J; Vintzileos A; Platt LD; Manning FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 226(4):475-486. PubMed ID: 35369904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decreased amniotic fluid volume at < 32 weeks of gestation is associated with decreased fetal movements.
    Sherer DM; Spong CY; Minior VK; Salafia CM
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Nov; 13(8):479-82. PubMed ID: 8989478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrated testing and management in fetal growth restriction.
    Turan S; Miller J; Baschat AA
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 32(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 18482621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal well-being: nonimaging assessment and the biophysical profile.
    Jackson GM; Forouzan I; Cohen AW
    Semin Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 26(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 2006429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acute oligohydramnios and deteriorating fetal biophysical profile associated with severe preeclampsia.
    Sherer DM; Dayal AK; Schwartz BM; Onyeije CI; Manning FA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 10406305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-assisted assessment of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Devoe LD; Searle N; Searle J; Phillips M; Castillo RA; Saad S; Sherline DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 153(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 3901767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A randomized clinical trial of daily nonstress testing versus biophysical profile in the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Lewis DF; Adair CD; Weeks JW; Barrilleaux PS; Edwards MS; Garite TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1495-9. PubMed ID: 10601934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Population differences affect the interpretation of fetal nonstress test results.
    Johnson TR; Paine LL; Strobino DM; Witter FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 179(3 Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 9757989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antepartum testing in patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
    Freeman RK
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Aug; 32(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 18652927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modified fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of perinatal outcome.
    Habek D; Hodek B; Herman R; Maticević A; Jugović D; Habek JC; Salihagić A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Jul; 123(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 11534302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations.
    Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.